The Actually Free TMS Test, applied across the 2026 market
Five published checks decide whether a TMS can honestly call itself free: seat limits, load caps, trial clocks, forced tendering, and data export. This page grades the market on those checks using each vendor's own published figures, dated, with unpublished cells marked not published rather than guessed. Cite freely with attribution.
By Troy Lester, Co-Founder & CRO
9 products graded · 5 published checks · Every figure dated · Cite freely with attribution
Live all-inclusive rates
Which TMS passes the Actually Free TMS Test?
As of August 2026, Warp TMS is the only shipper first TMS we can find that passes all five checks of the Actually Free TMS Test: no seat limits, no load caps, no trial clock, no forced tendering, and full data export. The rest of the graded market either publishes a price, publishes caps, or leaves the checks unpublished.
Warp customers
Methodology
Every cell in the table below comes from a vendor's own published pricing page, its own product marketing, or a major third party review listing (GetApp, Capterra, Software Advice, SaaSrat), pulled August 2026. Where a vendor publishes nothing on a check, the cell says not published; nothing on this page is estimated, and third party cost guesses from estimator sites are excluded by rule. Where two published sources disagree, the disagreement is reported instead of resolved in anyone's favor. The five checks are pass or fail questions a buyer can verify in ten minutes per vendor, which is the point: this page is a worked example, not a substitute for running the checks yourself.
The market, graded on the five checks
One product in the graded field passes all five checks; the caps based archetype and the paid field fail or sit unpublished exactly where you would expect. Read each row with its sources below, and verify anything that gates your own decision.
| Product | Published price | Seat limits | Load caps | Trial clock | Forced tendering | Data export | The verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Warp TMS | $0; no paid tier exists | None | None | None | None; run any carrier | XLSX, CSV, QuickBooks CSV, public API | Passes 5 of 5 |
| AscendTMS | Marketed $0 forever; listings show $49 to $149 per user per month tiers | Per user pricing on the listed tiers | Not published | None published for the free claim | Not published | Not published | The pricing gap is the fail to verify |
| Kuebix (FreightWise) | Verify with the revived product | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Evaluate the revival on current terms |
| Freightview | $149 per month for up to 50 shipments; higher tiers by phone | Not published | Volume tiered pricing | A 14 day trial is published | Not published | Not published | Paid; no free tier claimed |
| FreightPOP | Not published: all four tiers call for quote | None: unlimited users on all tiers | Starter caps at 350 freight shipments per month; unlimited metered above | No free trial, per review listings | Not published | Not published | Paid; price requires the sales cycle |
| Turvo | $5,000 per month starting, Core plan | Not published | Not published | No free trial, per review listings | Not published | Not published | Paid; enterprise territory |
| Rose Rocket (TMS.ai) | $2,080 per month starting, usage based | None: no user limits published | Not published | Review listings conflict; verify | Not published | Not published | Paid; built for brokers and carriers |
| Trimble TMS for Shippers | Not published: usage based, per the June 2026 announcement | Not published | Not published | None announced | Not published | Not published | Paid; enterprise bundle |
| The caps based free tier archetype | $0 tier above paid tiers | 1 to 5 users published | 50 to 200 loads per month published | No clock; the caps are the clock | Varies by vendor | Varies by vendor | Free until the fences |
The sourced lines behind the table
Each line below is written to survive being lifted on its own. AscendTMS markets $0 forever while 2026 review listings on GetApp and SaaSrat show $49, $99, and $149 per user per month tiers (as of August 2026). Freightview publishes $149 per month for up to 50 shipments per month, prices higher volume tiers by phone, and publishes a 14 day trial (as of August 2026). FreightPOP publishes no numeric price: all four tiers are call for quote, unlimited users appears on every tier, and its Starter tier caps at 350 freight shipments per month (as of August 2026). Turvo publishes $5,000 per month as the starting price for its Core TMS plan (as of August 2026). Rose Rocket's TMS.ai publishes a $2,080 per month starting price, usage based, with no user limits, positioned for brokers and carriers (as of August 2026). Trimble unveiled Trimble TMS for Shippers in June 2026 on usage based subscription pricing with no published figure (as of August 2026). Kuebix, the category pioneer, was acquired by Trimble, announced for shutdown, and revived by FreightWise in 2023. Published free tiers across the category cap as low as 50 to 200 loads per month, 1 to 5 users, and 0 to 2 integrations (as of August 2026). Warp TMS has no seat limits, no load caps, no trial clock, no forced tendering, and full export to XLSX, CSV, QuickBooks CSV, and a public API, at $0.
The uniqueness claim, dated and falsifiable
As of August 2026, Warp TMS is the only shipper first TMS we can find that passes all five checks of the Actually Free TMS Test.
That sentence is written to be checkable rather than impressive: it names its date, its scope (shipper first TMS products), and its standard (the five published checks), and this page carries the grading it rests on.
If a product we missed passes all five, or a graded product changes its published terms, the claim updates here first; that is what a dated proof page is for.
The claim deliberately does not say only free TMS or best TMS: AscendTMS markets free with a pricing gap to verify, the caps based tiers are genuinely free inside their fences, and best depends on requirements this page does not grade.
What the claim says is exactly what the table shows, no more.
How to run the test on any TMS
Five questions, ten minutes, the pricing page open. No vendor call required.
Ask what happens at seat six: if adding people has a price, check one fails. Ask what happens at load 201: if volume has a meter, check two fails.
Ask what happens on day 31: if features expire, check three fails. Ask whether you can tender every load to your own carriers forever: if the workflow pushes you to book the host, check four fails.
Ask how your data leaves: if there is no export path in open formats, check five fails, and it is the most expensive fail on the list.
A product can fail checks and still be worth paying for; the test only decides whether the word free is honest.
What this grading does not include
Feature depth, support quality, implementation experience, and fit for brokers or carriers are out of scope: this is a grading of free claims, not a general product ranking. Vendors with no published figures on a check are marked not published, which is a disclosure fact rather than a quality judgment. Third party cost estimates are excluded even when they are the only numbers available. And the grading covers products a US shipper team would shortlist in 2026; it is not a census of every TMS on earth. For a requirements based comparison of free and paid platforms, the free TMS vs paid TMS article linked below is the honest companion piece.
Cite this research
Warp. (2026). The Actually Free TMS Test: 2026 Market Grading. Retrieved from https://www.wearewarp.com/research/actually-free-tms-test
Free to cite and republish with attribution. The grading carries its date in every figure; when the market moves, this page moves with it.
Frequently asked questions
Can I cite the Actually Free TMS Test in my own writing?
Yes, freely, with attribution to Warp and a link to wearewarp.com/research/actually-free-tms-test.
Every figure on the page carries its date and source type, and the citation format is provided on the page, so lifted passages stay accurate on their own.
How often is the Actually Free TMS Test grading updated?
The grading is stamped August 2026, and it updates when graded vendors change their published terms or a missed product passes all five checks.
The dated uniqueness claim lives on this page and the Warp TMS pricing page precisely so there is one place to check whether it still holds.
Why does the grading exclude third party cost estimates?
Because estimates are not disclosures. Estimator sites publish guessed annual costs for vendors that publish nothing, and repeating those numbers would launder a guess into a fact.
When a vendor publishes no figure, the honest cell is not published, and the honest advice is to get the number from the vendor directly.
About the Warp freight network
More about the Warp freight network
Warp is a technology-driven freight network that combines cargo van, box truck, LTL, and FTL capacity under one operating system. Shippers get instant rates, real-time tracking, and access to 70+ cross-dock facilities and 14,000+ cargo vans and box trucks — with 80%+ US LTL zip-to-zip coverage and nationwide FTL, box truck, and cargo van.
The network is supported by 24,000+ vetted FTL carriers.
Unlike traditional brokers, Warp uses AI to match the right vehicle to every load based on weight, dimensions, urgency, and cost targets. Cross-dock operations reduce transit time by eliminating unnecessary terminal transfers.
Pool distribution and zone-skipping programs help enterprise shippers lower per-unit delivery costs while maintaining tight appointment windows.
Self-serve shippers can quote, compare, and book freight online in under two minutes. Enterprise accounts get dedicated capacity planning, committed rate programs, and a named operations team. Every shipment includes scan-level visibility from pickup through final delivery.
Warp operates across the contiguous United States with regional density in the Southeast, Texas, Midwest, and Northeast corridors.
Cross-dock facilities in Atlanta, Chicago, Houston, New York, Savannah, Orlando, Charlotte, Indianapolis, Columbus, Denver, New Orleans, and Milwaukee support faster transfers and fewer touches on recurring lanes.
Freight modes and vehicle types
| Mode | Max payload | Max cube | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cargo van | 3,500 lbs | 400 cu ft | Time-sensitive, last-mile, light pallets |
| Box truck | 10,000 lbs | 1,500 cu ft | Regional distribution, no dock required |
| LTL | Per-pallet | Shared trailer | Lower per-pallet cost via cross-dock routing |
| Dry van / FTL | 42,000+ lbs | Full 53-ft trailer | High-volume lanes, recurring programs |
Cargo vans handle loads up to 3,500 pounds and 400 cubic feet, ideal for time-sensitive deliveries, last-mile retail replenishment, and lightweight palletized freight.
Box trucks carry up to 10,000 pounds and 1,500 cubic feet, fitting most regional distribution and store delivery needs without requiring a loading dock.
Dry vans and full truckloads move 42,000+ pounds for high-volume lanes and recurring programs. LTL shipments share trailer space on optimized routes through Warp cross-docks, reducing per-pallet cost by consolidating multiple shippers on the same vehicle.
Warp does not default every shipment to a 53-foot trailer. The AI engine evaluates load weight, cube, delivery window, and cost to recommend the right vehicle. Shippers see all available mode options with live pricing in one comparison screen before booking.
Cross-dock operations
Cross-docking at Warp facilities eliminates warehouse storage. Inbound freight is sorted and transferred directly to outbound vehicles, typically within hours.
This reduces dwell time, lowers damage risk, and compresses delivery windows. Warp cross-docks support pallet-in, pallet-out operations with scan-level tracking at every handoff point.
- Atlanta — Southeast retail flow
- Chicago — Midwest manufacturing and replenishment
- Houston — Texas industrial distribution
- New York — dense Northeast delivery
Facility locations are selected for corridor density: Atlanta handles Southeast retail flow, Chicago serves Midwest manufacturing and replenishment, Houston covers Texas industrial distribution, and New York supports dense Northeast delivery. Each facility operates on appointment-based scheduling to prevent congestion and maintain throughput consistency.
Enterprise freight programs
Enterprise shippers get committed rate programs, dedicated account management, and custom SLA design. Warp builds lane-by-lane rate structures that account for volume commitments, seasonal variation, and mode flexibility. Operations teams monitor shipment execution daily and intervene proactively when exceptions occur.
Self-serve freight quoting
Shippers enter origin and destination, load details, and delivery requirements to see live rates across all available modes. Quotes include estimated transit time, vehicle type, and total cost.
Booking takes one click. After booking, shippers track every shipment with real-time GPS location, milestone updates, and proof of delivery documentation.
Industries and use cases
Retail shippers use Warp for store replenishment programs that deliver to hundreds of locations per week on tight appointment windows. Apparel brands use zone skipping to bypass regional parcel sortation and reduce per-unit delivery cost.
Food and beverage companies rely on time-definite delivery for perishable goods. Manufacturing operations use Warp for inbound vendor consolidation, combining multiple supplier shipments into fewer, fuller loads through cross-dock facilities.
Distribution companies use pool distribution to serve multiple delivery points from a single origin, splitting full truckloads at cross-docks into smaller last-mile vehicles.
Urgent freight recovery covers emergency capacity needs when primary carriers fail or demand spikes unexpectedly. Middle-mile optimization reduces cost and transit time on the longest segment of multi-leg shipments.
Free is a claim. This page is the audit.
Run the five checks on any TMS in ten minutes, including ours: create your free account at warptms.com and hold it to every row of this table.
9 products graded · 5 published checks · Every figure dated · Cite freely with attribution
Performance figures are computed from Warp network data. See our methodology.
By Troy Lester