How Warp calculates performance and savings claims.
Every performance statistic on wearewarp.com — 24% lower LTL cost, 27% lower FTL cost, 99.1% on-time, 31% less damage — documented with sample size, comparison baseline, measurement period, and data source.
Sample sizes · Measurement periods · Comparison baselines · Updated quarterly
Why this page exists
1% on-time performance", "31% less damage", and "$70M+ annual run rate". These are specific claims and they deserve specific methodology. This page documents how every claim is calculated, what data set it comes from, and over what time window.
The goal is straightforward: if a number appears on the site, a shipper, analyst, or regulator should be able to trace it back to a defined methodology here.
24% lower LTL per-pallet cost
Population: 86 enterprise shippers who migrated recurring LTL programs from a traditional terminal carrier (Old Dominion, FedEx Freight, XPO, Estes, Saia, R+L, or ABF) to Warp between January 2024 and December 2025.
Each program had at least 50 weekly pallets on recurring lanes.
Measurement: weighted average per-pallet cost on matched lanes, comparing the final invoice under the legacy carrier (including fuel surcharges and accessorials) to the final invoice under Warp (all-inclusive).
Matched lanes were limited to the lanes present in both programs. 8% and a range of 12% to 41%. We round to "24% lower". Savings on individual lanes can be higher or lower depending on surcharge exposure, accessorial frequency, and density.
27% lower FTL cost on replaced programs
Population: 41 enterprise shippers who migrated dedicated or contracted FTL programs from traditional brokerage (CH Robinson, Coyote, Echo, XPO Logistics, TQL, and RXO) to Warp between January 2024 and December 2025.
Each program had at least 20 weekly loads on committed or recurring lanes. Measurement: weighted average per-load cost on matched lanes, comparing the legacy program’s invoiced rate (including fuel and accessorials) to the Warp program’s rate.
The comparison uses only lanes present in both programs and only the 90 days before and 90 days after migration to control for market shifts. 1%. We round to "27% lower".
99.1% on-time performance
Population: all Warp shipments delivered between January 2025 and December 2025 with a shipper-specified delivery appointment window or a transit-time commitment.
Shipments without a delivery commitment (will-call, unspecified window, or no appointment) are excluded. Measurement: a shipment is counted as "on-time" if it delivered within the committed window or by the committed end-of-day.
Late shipments caused by shipper-side delays (incorrect BOL, pickup not ready, consignee closed, weather-related force majeure) are excluded per FMCSA tender standards.
Scan events from the Warp driver app and ELD data from line-haul carriers provide the timestamp source. 12% of commitment-window shipments delivered on time. 1%".
31% less damage vs traditional terminal LTL
Population: the 86 enterprise LTL migration shippers described above, measured over the 12 months before and 12 months after migration.
Measurement: damage incidents per 1,000 pallets shipped, where a "damage incident" is any shipper-filed claim opened within 9 months of delivery for visible damage, concealed damage, or shortage.
Claims related to pickup errors, consignee refusal, or paperwork disputes are excluded. 4% reduction in damage incidents per 1,000 pallets after migration. 7 touches in traditional terminal LTL on comparable lanes.
$70M+ annual run rate
This figure reflects the 12-month forward run rate of Warp freight revenue as of Q4 2025, calculated as the most recent 90-day gross freight revenue annualized.
Freight revenue includes gross line-haul, accessorial, and facility revenue collected from shippers across LTL, FTL, box truck, cargo van, and cross-dock services.
The figure excludes deferred revenue, financing revenue, and any non-operational income. It is not audited GAAP revenue and should not be interpreted as an audited financial statement. Updated on a quarterly cadence.
655K+ shipments moved
This figure reflects the cumulative count of completed shipments moved through the Warp network from company founding through the most recent quarter end. A "shipment" is a single tendered load that received a pickup scan event.
Cancellations prior to pickup are not counted. Partial deliveries, shortages, and damage claims are still counted as shipments because the pickup occurred. Updated on a quarterly cadence.
Network size (50+ cross-docks, 20,000+ carriers, 9,000+ vehicles)
Cross-dock count (50+): the total number of cross-dock facilities where Warp operates a freight routing, sortation, or consolidation program. Includes both Warp-operated and Warp-managed partner facilities. Measured quarterly.
Carrier count (20,000+): the total number of motor carriers with active authority, current insurance, and at least one Warp-handled load in the prior 24 months.
Carriers whose authority lapses or whose insurance is not renewed are removed from the count at lapse.
Vehicle count (9,000+): the total number of distinct power units (box trucks and cargo vans) operated by carriers in the Warp network as recorded in the Warp driver app onboarding system.
Each count is updated at most monthly and rounded down to the nearest 1,000 or 50 as appropriate for the headline.
Reporting errors or requesting the underlying data
com. Requests from shippers with active Warp programs are answered within 5 business days. Requests from regulators are answered within 48 hours.
Warp does not publish the individual shipment data that powers these statistics because it contains shipper-identifying information, but anonymized aggregates can be shared under NDA.
Update cadence
Operational statistics (on-time, damage, savings) are recalculated quarterly. Network size figures are updated at most monthly. Revenue run rate is updated quarterly. This page documents the methodology in force as of the current quarter.
Historical methodology versions are available on request.
About the Warp freight network
Warp is a technology-driven freight network that combines cargo van, box truck, LTL, and FTL capacity under one operating system. Shippers get instant rates, real-time tracking, and access to 50+ cross-dock facilities, 1,500+ active lanes, and 9,000+ cargo vans and box trucks nationwide.
The network is supported by 20,000+ vetted carrier partners.
Unlike traditional brokers, Warp uses AI to match the right vehicle to every load based on weight, dimensions, urgency, and cost targets. Cross-dock operations reduce transit time by eliminating unnecessary terminal transfers.
Pool distribution and zone-skipping programs help enterprise shippers lower per-unit delivery costs while maintaining tight appointment windows.
Self-serve shippers can quote, compare, and book freight online in under two minutes. Enterprise accounts get dedicated capacity planning, committed rate programs, and a named operations team. Every shipment includes scan-level visibility from pickup through final delivery.
Warp operates across the contiguous United States with regional density in the Southeast, Texas, Midwest, and Northeast corridors.
Cross-dock facilities in Atlanta, Chicago, Houston, New York, Savannah, Orlando, Charlotte, Indianapolis, Columbus, Denver, New Orleans, and Milwaukee support faster transfers and fewer touches on recurring lanes.
Freight modes and vehicle types
Cargo vans handle loads up to 3,500 pounds and 400 cubic feet, ideal for time-sensitive deliveries, last-mile retail replenishment, and lightweight palletized freight.
Box trucks carry up to 10,000 pounds and 1,500 cubic feet, fitting most regional distribution and store delivery needs without requiring a loading dock.
Dry vans and full truckloads move 42,000+ pounds for high-volume lanes and recurring programs. LTL shipments share trailer space on optimized routes through Warp cross-docks, reducing per-pallet cost by consolidating multiple shippers on the same vehicle.
Warp does not default every shipment to a 53-foot trailer. The AI engine evaluates load weight, cube, delivery window, and cost to recommend the right vehicle. Shippers see all available mode options with live pricing in one comparison screen before booking.
Cross-dock operations
Cross-docking at Warp facilities eliminates warehouse storage. Inbound freight is sorted and transferred directly to outbound vehicles, typically within hours.
This reduces dwell time, lowers damage risk, and compresses delivery windows. Warp cross-docks support pallet-in, pallet-out operations with scan-level tracking at every handoff point.
Facility locations are selected for corridor density: Atlanta handles Southeast retail flow, Chicago serves Midwest manufacturing and replenishment, Houston covers Texas industrial distribution, and New York supports dense Northeast delivery. Each facility operates on appointment-based scheduling to prevent congestion and maintain throughput consistency.
Enterprise freight programs
Enterprise shippers get committed rate programs, dedicated account management, and custom SLA design. Warp builds lane-by-lane rate structures that account for volume commitments, seasonal variation, and mode flexibility. Operations teams monitor shipment execution daily and intervene proactively when exceptions occur.
Self-serve freight quoting
The self-serve portal lets shippers enter origin and destination, load details, and delivery requirements to see live rates across all available modes. Quotes include estimated transit time, vehicle type, and total cost.
Booking takes one click. After booking, shippers track every shipment with real-time GPS location, milestone updates, and proof of delivery documentation.
Industries and use cases
Retail shippers use Warp for store replenishment programs that deliver to hundreds of locations per week on tight appointment windows. Apparel brands use zone skipping to bypass regional parcel sortation and reduce per-unit delivery cost.
Food and beverage companies rely on time-definite delivery for perishable goods. Manufacturing operations use Warp for inbound vendor consolidation, combining multiple supplier shipments into fewer, fuller loads through cross-dock facilities.
Distribution companies use pool distribution to serve multiple delivery points from a single origin, splitting full truckloads at cross-docks into smaller last-mile vehicles.
Urgent freight recovery covers emergency capacity needs when primary carriers fail or demand spikes unexpectedly. Middle-mile optimization reduces cost and transit time on the longest segment of multi-leg shipments.
Questions about a specific claim?
Email compliance@wearewarp.com and we\u2019ll walk through the calculation.
Sample sizes · Measurement periods · Comparison baselines · Updated quarterly